Occupational hygiene consultancy focused on employee health.

Personal and static air sampling is used to understand how airborne contaminants such as dusts, solvents and isocyanates are affecting the workplace in practice, not just in theory.

The aim is to build a clearer evidence base around exposure levels, task risk and control performance so decisions on further action are proportionate and defensible.

Thorough examination and interval testing checks whether extraction systems are performing as intended and continuing to protect employees under COSHH requirements.

This helps businesses move beyond relying on the presence of LEV alone, by understanding where maintenance, adjustment or further review is needed to keep exposure controls effective.

Noise assessments measure employee exposure in line with the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 and help clarify where action values, hearing protection or control improvements need closer attention.

The focus is on turning measured results into practical control decisions so managers can understand what matters most and how to reduce long-term hearing risk in live working environments.

Static or personal monitoring to MDHS 14/4 guidance helps quantify particulate exposure and gives a more reliable picture of how dusty activities are affecting employees across the shift.

This is particularly useful where processes, housekeeping standards or ventilation performance make it difficult to judge risk confidently from observation alone.

COSHH assessments review how hazardous substances are used, where exposure can occur and whether the controls already in place are suitable for the task, process and people involved.

Recommendations are then shaped around practical improvement, helping businesses strengthen handling, storage, ventilation, PPE and supervision where required.

LEV testing, air monitoring, COSHH assessment reviews and noise assessments can be planned together so exposure risks are considered as part of one joined-up programme rather than in isolation.

This improves value, reduces disruption on site and gives leadership teams a more coherent view of where health risks sit and which actions should be prioritised first.